Tag github

 Like

Liked a post on Twitter
Post details

 Like

Liked a post on Twitter
Post details

 Reply

Does this include breaking down unethical uses of software by organisations like ICE?

 Like

Liked a post on Twitter
Post details

 Like

Liked a post on Twitter
Post details

 Like

Liked a post on Twitter
Post details

 Reply

As it doesn't retain the history from the template, it may not be possible to update them easily?

 Reply

We've found it to work quite well on my team, as it allows folks to see things they're not necessarily involved in, and actively seeks out their thoughts, as well as not leaving it up to the PR raiser to decide who

(Although we're currently using the "round Robin" approach)

It also doesn't mean others can't review

 Reply

Hmm I'll have to try it but I thought rebase-merge was the same as a --no-ff merge

 Reply

You can also do this with a "rebase merge" on GitHub, and yep would recommend it if you don't want merge commits. I'd generally say keep them, but amend the titles to be ie PR title

 Reply

We only have this set up in a few places as it's not possible to do it org-level as you say, or configure it via the API https://github.community/t/support-autolink-reference-configuration-in-the-api/14614/

 Like

Liked a post on Twitter
Post details